From York Factory to Winnipeg, four hundred years in one line.
Hudson's Bay Company surveyors and factors, their Cree and Okanagan wives, Orkney boatmen, Wiltshire weavers, Quebec habitants and a Presbyterian missionary who sat in Riel's council. This is the family of Frederick Allan Davis and Doris Rose Silverthorn, assembled from Ancestry research and cleaned for the whole family to explore.
Hover a dot to read the name; click to open the person.
Explore the tree
Click any card to move through the generations. Grandparents on the left, children on the right.
Trace the line
The whole family as a chart. Click a person's circle to open or close the generation behind them; click a name to read their entry. Drag to pan, scroll or pinch to zoom.
Everyone in the tree
… people shown
| Name | Years | Where | Relationship | Confidence |
|---|
The fur-trade generation
Seven ancestors who appear in the history books. Each links to the person in the tree and to a published biography.
An open question: where did "Davis" come from?
Grandfather Frederick was born a Flett at St Clements, Manitoba, on 13 April 1893, son of George Peter Flett and a Margaret Anne whose maiden name is still unknown. By the time his sons were born in Winnipeg the family name was Davis. Nobody has yet found the record that explains the change: an adoption, a stepfather, or a decision to take a new name. If you know anything about this, or have papers from Frederick or Lillian, that is the single most useful thing you could add to this tree. Open Frederick's entry.
Ask about the family
Claude has the whole tree in front of it. Ask for a report, a story, a table, or a research plan. It will tell you when something is uncertain.
Pick a report on the left or ask anything about the family.
About the data
Exported from Ancestry on 20 September 2026, then cleaned: duplicates merged, names tidied, dates parsed, every entry rated for confidence.
Close relatives with gaps
Within four generations of Tony. These are the easiest to fix from family papers.
Entries that need review
Dates that cannot be right, usually copied from other Ancestry trees. Left in place but not trusted.
How confidence is rated
well supported within seven generations of Tony with no date problems and consistent with published history. some support has a source citation or is recent enough to check. unverified is older than 1750 with no attached source. needs review has an impossible date or a circular relationship.
Adding to the tree
Send corrections, photos, dates and documents to Tony. Changes are made in Ancestry, re-exported, cleaned and republished here, so this page always reflects the latest agreed version.